Biden has covid, but he doesn't have cancer. What should we believe?

Biden apparently misspoke when he said he has cancer, but based on a word alone we should believe he has covid. We're being asked to believe some things and ignore others.

One of the reasons I decided to start screaming into the void with this Substack is because I am sick and tired of the media putting a steady stream of shit into the ether, which mixes with real nuggets of truth. Sift through the noise, that's my mission statement. Such a mission statement is hard when the people you're hearing things from want you to believe things selectively, depending on their whims. Believe this, don't believe that even though we told you that. Once a liar, always a liar, I say.

Karine Jean-Pierre, the newest professional liar for the Biden Administration as Press Secretary, reported that President Biden has covid. He is experiencing "very mild symptoms" and that he will be isolating himself for the foreseeable future, but will continue to perform his duties as Commander-in-Chief. Apparently he's also being treated with Paxlovid. All facts, according to a liar, which makes me want to augment it in my mind, based on how trustworthy they are.

Using the FDR example ( Franklin Delano Roosevelt ) we can extrapolate that his symptoms are severe and that he's actually being treated with Joe Rogan's "kitchen sink" method of covid treatment, maybe even including “horse medicine” as the Twitter bots and CNN like to call it. The FDA and Pfizer's CEO can't agree on what to do if symptoms return after a course of Paxlovid - being that, in light of symptoms returning, of course a second course of Paxlovid is needed according to the guy who sells Paxlovid, while the FDA says other treatment options should be explored if Paxlovid doesn't work. Who are we to believe?

I want answers without agenda, but there's too much money at stake. I'm sure Pfizer is sweating bullets since this is either the greatest endorsement or the biggest indictment of that swill they're pushing as a solution for infected individuals. I'm sure the Pelosis will be the first to know if the President dies so they can put in a short position against Pfizer.

Let's address the other side of this now. Biden, in a speech, proclaimed that he has cancer. Of course like many crazy things he's said, Whitehouse staff was quick to walk it back and proclaim that he doesn't currently have cancer, but that he has a history of needing to have non-melanoma skin cancers removed. Sure, they're not all that uncommon, but this is in addition to a myriad of other maladies he has had in his life. The man has had two brain aneurysms. Most people don't easily come back from one aneurysm.

Actress Emilia Clarke has also had two brain aneurysms, and is quoted as saying the following: "The amount of my brain that is no longer usable — it's remarkable that I am able to speak, sometimes articulately, and live my life completely normally with absolutely no repercussions. I am in the really, really, really small minority of people that can survive that."

Emilia Clark is a young woman with much greater neuroplasticity. Biden's aneurysms occurred in 1988, how much of his brain has further eroded since then?

We need a comprehensive and transparent physical and cognitive assessment of our President. Don't sugarcoat anything, don't bullshit the American people. He is at the helm of the greatest superpower the world has ever seen, with enough nukes to level the planet. This only makes me renew my call that there needs to be a maximum age limit for public office, and Joe Biden is seemingly way past his "Best used by" date.