D.O.J files motion to unseal warrant, Merrick Garland addresses controversy, defends FBI and D.O.J agents.

AG Merrick Garland spoke on Thursday, addressing the controversy of the raid on Trump's Mar-A-Lago home, and announces that the warrant will be unsealed due to public outcry.

D.O.J files motion to unseal warrant, AG Garland addresses controversy, defends FBI and D.O.J agents.

AG Merrick Garland spoke on Thursday, addressing the controversy of the raid on Trump's Mar-A-Lago home, and announces that the warrant will be unsealed due to public outcry.

Merrick Garland wants Trump to know it was him.

Attorney General Merrick Garland spoke on Thursday afternoon to announce that the Department of Justice has filed a motion in the Southern district of Florida to unseal the search warrant and property receipt generated by the raid on Trump's Mar-A-Lago home.

This is in response to public outcry resulting from Trump's public confirmation of the raid, and of rightful concerns by the public that the current regime in power might be seeking to punish their political rivals. I think that ship has sailed, the January 6 show trial tells you all you need to know about their feelings on that course of action. It's looking like they'll stop at nothing to haul to gulag all of us for not capitulating. And if that sounds a bit presumptuous, trust me, it's not. You don't undo good, functional policies unless you're a sociopath on a power trip with a vendetta against half the country and no regard whatsoever for the useful idiots that voted for you.

Garland comes off as disingenuous every time he opens his mouth, but especially when he talked about "applying the law evenly".

Here's the full quote: "Upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly, without fear, or favor. Under my watch, that is precisely what the Justice Department is doing."

Huh. Still no investigation into Biden literally selling influence and making under-the-table business deals through his crackhead son to do deals with foreign companies, and the CCP.

Applying the law evenly without fear or favor would bring down a lot of people. Did the government destroy their files on Hillary Clinton? Could always bring that one back up. Also, that Ghislaine Maxwell client list - if you could just unseal that and make it public, that’d be swell. Applying the law evenly wouldn’t entail a sweeping indictment of an entire political party while protecting your own. Merrick Garland is playing politics, doing all he can to try and swing the election in November.

Oh, but he’s mad at all of us for giving his minions a hard time. He won’t stay silent while we slander his FBI and Justice Department bureaucrats. I guess he didn’t think employing literal Gestapo tactics would garner any criticism. His mistake can be forgiven, under him we’ve seen an elderly grandmother sentenced to jail time after being welcomed into a building owned by the American people by police officers and nary a peep of indignation hit the airwaves over that one.

Something about all this stinks, though. If Trump was already cooperating with authorities and they literally had him install a lock to keep the files in his basement safe, why the raid? The idea of cooperating with authorities is that you’re giving them what they want. But I suppose it’s a similar example to the Alex Jones kangaroo court trial — no amount of cooperation satisfies their demands, because that might result in an acquittal.

In light of the fact that the magistrate who signed off on the search warrant in the first place, Judge Bruce Reinhart, had also done quite a measure of work for Jeffrey Epstein and associated folks — including a woman Epstein called his “Yugoslavian Sex Slave” — during his legal career, is it at all possible that the files Trump has might have damning information he’s holding as leverage? Maybe even against Bruce Reinhart? I mean, Trump was President when Epstein was arrested, and would’ve easily been able to access files related to the investigation into Epstein if he so chose.

I’m sure some will allege that he might’ve been protecting his own neck in that case, but somehow I doubt it. I would never believe that wouldn’t have been front and center of every new outlets feed and publications the very second it was found. The media’s behavior and now the behavior of the Biden regime would’ve saw Trump drawn and quartered if he was compromised by Epstein. But I digress.

Merrick Garland’s indignation toward Republicans definitely has history behind it. It was Republicans who blocked him from taking over Antonin Scalia’s spot on the bench after Scalia’s untimely — and suspicious — death.

Scalia’s connection to Garland is especially interesting when you consider something Scalia famously wrote when dissenting in the Supreme court decision on Morrison v. Olson,” Nothing is so politically effective as the ability to charge that one's opponent and his associate are not merely wrong-headed, naive, ineffective, but, in all probability, 'crooks,'" wrote Scalia. "And nothing so effectively gives an appearance of validity to such charges as a Justice Department investigation and, even better prosecution,” — How fitting, then, that Garland would wield his power in just such a manner. And against a former President who is advocating for removing power-hungry bureaucrats like Garland from their posts due to the danger they present to the stability of the nation.

Attorney General Garland — do us all a favor; take your ball and go home before you do any more damage.

Thanks for reading, if you liked this article then please consider subscribing here on Substack and please follow me on my social media accounts for more updates.