Pfizer exec admits no testing went into whether covid vaccine would prevent transmission

A major scandal is brewing at the heart of one of the biggest power players in the post-covid medical industry. What say you, vaccine champions? Still trust the science that was never done?

In a statement that really shouldn’t come as much of a surprise to anyone who has spent more than 5 minutes looking into all the shady practices that dominate the ‘big pharma’ landscape, Pfizer has been caught in a terrible lie when looking at how their covid vaccines were marketed.

Pfizer executive Janine Small, appearing on behalf of the CEO of Pfizer and World Economic Forum stooge, Albert Bourla ( Mr. Compliance himself ), testified before the European Union Parliament on Monday, when a Dutch Member of the European Parliament hailing from by the name of Rob Roos asked her a question about Pfizer’s research and development of their covid vaccine.

“Was the Pfizer Covid vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?” Mr Roos inquired, going further by insisting on a straight “yes or no” answer rather than the usual question-dodging rigamarole we typically see in our political theatre congressional hearings here in the U.S.

“Regarding the question around, um, did we know about stopping the immunization [sic] before it entered the market? No,” said Small with a nervous laugh before qualifying that answer.

”…you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market, and from that point of view we had to do everything at risk. I think Dr. Bourla, even though he’s not here, would turn around and say to you himself, ‘If not us then who?’”

Moving at the speed of science obviously requires one to also engage in blatant false advertising while protected wholesale by the convenient blanket granted by the U.S. Government in particular absolving Pfizer of all liability regarding any complications or issues surrounding their vaccines. This naturally adds precedence that most other world powers would likely revere and comply with when considering rulings against Pfizer on these grounds, whether they agree or not.

”[Dr Bourla] actually felt the importance of what was going on in the world, and therefore as a result of that, we actually, um, spent $US2 billion, at risk, of self-funded money from Pfizer, to be able to research, develop and manufacture at risk, to be able to make sure that we were in a position to be able to help with the pandemic,” Said small when speaking on behalf of her superior, which I regard as a blatant, blatant lie.

A company like Pfizer would have been in talks with governments during their research and development process of a vaccine meant to curtail a worldwide pandemic, so to say they spent $2 billion of their own money ‘at risk’ doesn’t really hold water. They may have initially spent their own money, but it was more than likely done so with the guaranteed profits heavily outweighing any initial investment.

Consider the following: Pfizer’s gross profits nearly doubled from 2020 to 2021. $81.3 billion in gross profits whereas in 2020 — when their main cash cows were not at all covid-related, including things like a cancer drug called Ibrance and a fibromyalgia drug called Lyrica — sat at roughly $41.7 billion. Enter 2021, and that’s when they started making money hand-over-fist for the covid vaccine, of which they’ve sold billions of doses to governments around the world. They have since projected their overall covid vaccine sales in 2021 and 2022 to top $65 billion. Few would stop the money train for a simple little oversight like whether the vaccine will prevent transmission or worse, reinfection of the vaccine recipient.

So the question remains — will there be lawsuits? Nope. There can’t be. As I stated earlier, the extremely reckless leadership here in the U.S. thought it prudent to extend immunity from liability to Pfizer for anything related to covid vaccines. That includes if you are vaccine-injured, even including death directly related to the vaccine. Even if there was a major class-action lawsuit to be allowed, you can bet that there would be no payout great enough to actually hurt Pfizer. They might have to pony up a bit of those exorbitant amounts of cash they’re making, but not enough to make their executives balk at buying another yacht.

I’m not a socialist, but one industry I believe should not be allowed the pursuit of profit is the medical industry at large, and that includes pharmaceuticals. We see where it gets us now, with Americans having to choose between meals and drugs they need to survive just to pad the wallets of medical industry big wigs and their bought-and-paid-for politicians.

Do I have a solution to that problem? Nope, not a realistic one. Just an idealistic one where politicians and corporate executives aren’t motivated by money and self-interest, and actually do right by the people who have no choice but to trust them.

Voting is also not the solution so long as companies like Pfizer can continue financing both sides of the aisle to ensure bills that would harm them are shot down, and bills that would benefit them are passed and signed without a fuss by a puppet president. We definitely got one of those.

In closing, we need a solution that bypasses Congress and our leadership entirely. I have one crazy idea but it would require stringent voter registration requirements based on intelligence and knowledge of both the political process and the intimate policy positions of every candidate you vote for.

It’s an exhausting fight, but we can’t quit, so get louder.

Join Webull through this link, sign up for any amount, and get free stocks! Click here.