Pfizer story suppressed, the art of the bait-and-switch: how media covers up scandals for big corps

Pfizer's Jordan Trishton Walker has been a hot topic that big pharma desperately wants us to forget, and they're using their contacts in the media to do it.

Join WeBull today, deposit ANY AMOUNT and get free stocks! Click here.

It’s well established that the newsmedia is bought and paid for by billionaires to ensure the coverage doesn’t go against them, if they can possibly help it. And if powerful entities flush with cash to throw around don’t directly own the news outlets, they influence the coverage aired by these outlets pertaining to certain stories through advertising dollars. This ensures that these publications will be compelled to forego any semblance of impartiality by refusing to cover stories that are detrimental to the people sponsoring them.

If the whole thing were more honest, it would sound like this: “Here’s your spin cycle of distraction and brainwashing to keep you blissfully ignorant to how the world really works, brought to you by Pfizer.”

What are the odds that both the Paul Pelosi hammer attack police bodycam video, AND the Tyre Nichols fatal beating video hit the airwaves on the same exact day? All of this gets dropped while a story about Pfizer’s head of R&D admitting the company is looking into intentionally mutating covid to sell more vaccines is spreading like wildfire? Those odds have to be abysmal if we’re talking about an organic release of both videos. But a planned drop to run cover for a bombshell story about a large pharmaceutical company who incidentally also sponsors most news programs you see on TV? Much, much better odds.

They’re trying to distract you. Is it working?

Certainly those other stories deserve plenty of attention, but everything in it’s own time. The Pelosi attack story is several months old by now, so we can definitely afford to leave that on the backburner. Tyre Nichols is a different story entirely, and I don’t want to discount the importance of addressing that story, but when you tell me that Pfizer, one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies on earth is looking into making what I can only categorize as bioweapons to use against the public in order to fatten their profit margins by reinvigorating demand for vaccines? Then the Pfizer story takes precedence in my mind.

For context on the Pfizer situation, Project Veritas has exposed an individual by the name of Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer's Director of Research and Development, strategic operations and mRNA Scientific Planning, who has revealed that Pfizer is exploring avenues where they may be able to utilize what is known as 'directed evolution' of the covid-19 virus in order to facilitate changes in the virus to effectively allow them to 'get out ahead' of the more organic process of mutation of viruses in the wild in order to attempt to pre-emptively create vaccines to counter mutations that might emerge as the virus infects people and evolves.

Now I'm sure if you're at least somewhat well-versed in the rule that viral evolution tends to follow, you know that viruses tend to become more infectious and less deadly over time as more strains emerge. But with a little bit of science™, companies like Pfizer looking to make a supervirus can easily do so, improving not only the virus' infectiousness, but it's lethality.

According to an anonymous source whose credentials are in the field of viral research, research that is capable of directing evolution to go against the usual progression of viruses where they become more infectious but less deadly is not only possible, but doing so is effectively a trivial ask for competent scientists.

To get back on the original topic, let’s look at the efforts by big tech to deeply curtail the reach Project Veritas’ exposé of Pfizer’s plans by Walker’s admission, and it’s all being led by Google.

We all know that if the leading search engine in the world nukes your content, there won’t be many eyes on it, no matter what you do.

Google has been working overtime to distract the public by outright censoring search results to try and put a lid on Project Veritas’ reach in order to clamp down on the Pfizer story they uncovered. And that was done before the police video drops mentioned above.

YouTube, by extension, has done this to Project Veritas:

That’s right, YouTube has hit Project Veritas with a strike for reasons unknown in order to stop their ability to upload anything more for a while, while also removing the videos about the Pfizer story that is unfolding currently.

This is a huge blow to Project Veritas and it threatens to kill the Pfizer story before it ever gets out to the sleepy masses. They’re Epsteining this one.

A week is a long time in the newscycle, that’s plenty of time for mainstream media to swoop in and lay down enough distraction to clog the proverbial airwaves so that the little matter of Pfizer’s Research and Development head admitting they’re looking into making bioweapons goes away and the useful idiots on social media who inexplicably advocate for those filthy criminals in tailored suits can run their volunteer spin cycle on the facts to fool the other knuckledraggers like themselves into not looking into it.

For Pfizer’s crimes, here is what should happen:

1. Break up the company
2. Arrest any executives overseeing these bioweapons operations
3. End the medical-industrial complex and make the pharmaceutical industry strictly nonprofit
4. Do the same to the medical industry as a whole

Imagine how quickly good people would then start to work for humanity’s benefit and starting curing diseases again without having their discoveries buried for the sake of profit.

Pfizer did at least see fit to release a statement, denying everything, of course. It only took a few days and considerable outcry to get a few words out of them, no thanks to the newsmedia who were prepared to give them a full pass. Can’t have Pfizer pulling out those advertising dollars, after all.

”Allegations have recently been made related to gain of function and directed evolution research at Pfizer and the company would like to set the record straight,” the statement begins. 

“In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research,” says Pfizer’s PR team.

The rest of the statement basically becomes a Paxlovid infomercial where they start talking about the research process, to at least admit to in-vitro research ( petri dish cultures ) which, I guess, is meant to throw us all off the trail by pretending they’re on the level. I’m not buying it.

It’s a half-hearted press release and likely any internal communications about the subject matter that Jordon Trishton Walker was talking about are being scrubbed, or have already been scrubbed. Sadly we can’t look forward to the Pfizer files any time soon.

Transparency is not Pfizer’s strong suit, since they tried to hide the side effects list for their covid vaccine for 75 years. Luckily U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman told them to kick rocks, in that regard, forcing them to release the documentation.

Sadly, though, in the case of the admissions by Pfizer’s Jordon Trishton Walker, the company will work like a government agency, clamping down on information and engaging in extreme compartmentalization going forward to ensure discretion amongst their executives. It’s likely this research will be stalled, but not abandoned. There is too much money at stake.

Let’s consider this a victory all the same for the people who might have been sickened by Pfizer’s psychotic research. Hats off to James O’Keefe and Project Veritas once again. Keep fighting the good fight.