Pfizer's covid vaccine price to skyrocket after CDC recommendation
The media scrambles to cover up info after the CDC recommendation to add the covid vaccine to immunization schedules sees the light of day. Pfizer's response? Raise vaccine prices.
If you had the chance to do something to help your fellow man, would you? Most people would say yes, and there wouldn’t be any caveat attached. Now imagine you’re a big pharma executive, beholden to shareholders of your publicly-traded company. What would you say then? “Only if there’s money in it”. Unequivocally, across the board, that’s what all big pharma execs do say, if not with their words, then their actions.
Pfizer, in light of the news that the CDC is set to vote on recommending an update to compulsory vaccination schedules for children that includes the covid vaccine, has made it public that they intend to raise the price of their vaccine from $30 a dose to as much as $130 a dose, more than four times the current price. This is in anticipation of the end of the covid emergency in 2023 relegating them to having to gouge private insurers for the vaccines, like they do everything else. I would think that ‘most favored nation’ agreement we once tried to put into place would prevent that, but we are the same nation who also refuses to price control insulin so that people don’t have to get their limbs sawed off because they had to choose between buying insulin and buying groceries. Amputations are big business, after all. Better to get the money through a procedure that has to be insured than to just make the damn insulin affordable, after all. You might say big pharma is literally charging an arm and a leg for life-saving treatments.
Reuters tried to obfuscate this fact by entirely upending the whole paradigm of supply and demand by suggesting that the real reason for the price hikes for the vaccines was weak demand. That’s right, because that’s what you do with a product that no one wants to buy, you raise the price of it. Their reasoning was so that their revenue projections would still fit their previous forecasts. I think they might end up being disappointed on that one, but not if there is a government mandate put in place to compel parents to roll the dice on their child getting lifetime repercussions from a one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule just so they will be allowed to attend public school.
It’s the classic gun-to-the-head business model that big pharma companies are known for. By the way, all you people on social media constantly misusing the word ‘fascist’? This very story is the epitome of fascism, the marriage of corporate influence and government power acting in concert for their mutual benefit. FDR even defined it for you way back in 1938.
So how many vaccines has Pfizer sold to the U.S. Government? According to Statista, a statistics website specializing in market and consumer data, the number as of September of 2022 topped over 367 million. At $30 a pop that comes to over $11 billion in revenue. At the new price point maximum they’re deciding on, that number would exceed $47 billion. Couple that with the fact that it’s very likely the guidance will lead to a yearly vaccine akin to the flu vaccine, and we’re looking at a tidy cash cow for Pfizer and their ilk. Even more will come if more organizations, both private and government-affiliated, decide that the vax is mandatory on a yearly basis.
Think of this also: even without this price hike, their profits nearly doubled from 2020 to 2021, from $41 billion to $81 billion, at the current price point. At the proposed price point? If we assume that they made the same amount off all their other products, that would mean 2021’s takings from covid vaccines alone were $40 billion. Since the proposed increase in price would effectively multiply the price per dose by 4, then Pfizer’s 2021 revenue from the covid vaccine alone would have topped $160 billion. That is of course during the heights of the pandemic but there will likely be spikes in covid cases that will drive up demand for the foreseeable future, so it’s definitely not outside the realm of possibility to say that is a feasible number for them to achieve. Adding in mandated vaccine schedules including covid vaccines? It’s a no-brainer: Pfizer stands to make money hand over fist, more than they already do.
I mentioned the media cover-up going on, obfuscating the truth about the reason behind the price hike and pretending that the CDC has never even proposed recommending the inclusion of covid vaccines on mandated vaccine schedules. Here. Debunked. This is why you don’t trust mainstream fact checkers, they’re gaslight factories with an agenda, nothing more.
Politico will be who I center on here, as it would basically be a situation where I’m parroting the same exact point, as all the ‘fact-checkers’ have their script down pat on this one. Their position on it is mostly right, but there’s a deviously unspoken caveat: The CDC can only make recommendations, states determine their own vaccine schedules, however. But what do you think is going to happen? Kids in blue states haven’t got a chance. They’re going to be forced to take experimental jabs regardless of their personal health issues, or their religion, or any other factor, because blue states trust whatever drivel the Bill and Melinda Gates-funded CDC wants to push. Sure, they don’t provide all the funding, but whenever funding is given to an organization, the donors typically command certain things of that organization, and nobody loves a vaccine more than Bill Gates.
You know, the guy who said this in 2010:
”The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3.”
These people do not have our best interests at heart. It’s why all these conversations often converge with the big bad bogeyman known as ‘climate change’. Now I’m sure you’re asking just how vaccination would tie into climate change. It’s rather simple: Less people = less pollution. Remember that next time some WEF ‘stakeholder’ type wants to pontificate about reducing carbon.
As Luke Rudkowski of We Are Change likes to say: YOU are the carbon these people want to reduce.
But wouldn’t it be so nice for our overlords to turn a tidy profit from us before stamping us out with germ warfare? I don’t know about you, but that’s how I want to go out, making sure I give my fair share toward the yachts being purchased off my body being irreversibly damaged by experimental pharmaceuticals.
Fuck that.
Join Webull through this link, sign up for any amount, and get free stocks! Click here.